Hmm... about the conflict of beliefs..
I personally think that it isn't right for anyone to remove someone or some party just because they don't fit in. But in a world now, where people here and there cross paths like... i dunno.. spiderwebs upon spiderwebs? it's very hard to fully acclimatise to one's surrounding people. People here and there doing things you know you don't believe in, but you can't exactly walk up to that person and say "Hey, I don't like what you're doing, so go away!" All you can do is to either avoid that person, ignore him or smth. Each person has an individual right to do what he/she wants, unless his actions compromises another person.
Like online. Anyone can be anyone and everyone. He/she can do whatever he wants. He can surf anyone's blog, post any comment he wants, make any website he wants. Noone has the right to stop him/her unless what he is doing causes actual harm to someone else..
For e.g. i can like whatever music i want. People can say i'm emo, rock, pop, lousy taste, anything. But i am entitled to the right to listen to my music either way. Similarly, i can defend the music i listen to, saying it rocks, its the best, etcetc. But i cannot force mine onto others. I can pass what i listen to to others so they can have a try, but its up to them whether they accept it, listen to it or delete it afterwards.
I guess when conflicts happen, the parties involved can only try and discuss to create a compromise that all can be happy with? It's the only way to prevent war from happening anyway..
But if conflicts do not get resolved (as shown in many, MANY cases today), i think the only way to solve things is to split these 2 groups up. Segregation is preferable rather than all out war, isn't it?
-Kevin
Thursday 17 May 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment